What Is Truth? Ask, Study, and Live What You Learn
It's good to ask what is true. Let's also be willing to study the answer, accept correction, and do what we learn when obedience gets uncomfortable.
#131 — What Is Truth?
Nov 23, 2020
Play the original Excel Still More episode here without leaving the article.
A question can begin a better life
When we ask what is true, are we ready for an answer that might change us? The question can express skepticism, sincere inquiry, impatience, or a willingness to reconsider what we thought we knew. Its value depends partly on what follows. A person who asks but refuses to listen has not moved far. A person who listens but declines to act may possess an answer without receiving its practical benefit.
John 18 puts that question beside the choices people made while Jesus was being tried. The chapter also records Peter's denials. These events should first be understood as the history of Jesus' arrest and trial, not merely examples from a self-improvement lesson. Yet they expose enduring failures in our relationship to truth: protecting an existing position, avoiding a conclusion, and failing to live a conviction we already hold.
Do not let certainty close the inquiry
It's easy to read about people rejecting Jesus and never consider whether I protect my own conclusions the same way. We should avoid turning that specific opposition into a statement about every Jewish person or every religious leader. John's account concerns real people and decisions. The warning for us is about a posture that protects an established position even when evidence challenges it.
The Pharisees in John 9 were so sure they could see that they refused the light right in front of them. Their insistence that they see exposes their refusal to acknowledge the truth before them. Confidence becomes dangerous when it makes correction impossible. A belief doesn't become biblical merely because it is familiar, widely held in our circle, or part of our upbringing. It should be supported by what Scripture actually teaches.
Keep humility tied to a reliable standard
Being teachable doesn't mean agreeing with everyone who has something new to say. It means being willing to test an idea honestly and to change when the evidence requires it. Acts 17:11 commends those who received the word eagerly and examined the Scriptures to see whether the teaching was so. They combined openness with examination instead of choosing between unquestioning acceptance and automatic rejection.
We need that willingness to study when the question involves worship, the church's work, or our response to the gospel. A person can bind a personal tradition as though it were God's command, or loosen a biblical requirement because it has become unpopular. Neither error is repaired by emotion alone. State the question precisely, read the relevant passages in context, and distinguish what the text establishes from what you have assumed it establishes.
Pilate's question needed a responsible answer
Before we use Pilate as an example, let's pay attention to what John actually tells us. In His exchange with Pilate, Jesus explains that His kingdom isn't of this world and that He came to testify to the truth. Pilate then asks what truth is and goes out to the accusers. The account doesn't explain his inner motive fully, so we shouldn't confidently label his question sincere curiosity or dismissive sarcasm.
Pilate knew Jesus was innocent, and that makes his decision to surrender Him to the crowd especially troubling. John 19:4–16 makes that failure particularly clear. We shouldn't weaken his statements into mere uncertainty about whether Jesus was guilty. He declared the absence of guilt and nevertheless delivered Him to be crucified. His conduct shows that recognizing a fact and taking responsibility for it can be painfully different things.
We don't need to invent a later chapter in Pilate's life to feel the weight of the decision John records. The Gospel narratives don't supply a later conversion story or authorize us to decide his ultimate fate beyond what God has revealed. The useful lesson rests on the decisions recorded in the text. Speculation about a possible later change shouldn't soften the injustice of handing over an innocent man. Let's stay with the decision John records and let it ask hard questions about our own willingness to do what's right.
Investigation takes more than collecting opinions
If a question matters, let's give it more than a quick search for someone who already agrees with us. Read enough of the passage to see who is speaking, what issue is being addressed, and how the argument develops. Consider other relevant passages without forcing them into agreement with a preferred conclusion. Good study may require time, a trustworthy teacher, and a willingness to separate a definite biblical statement from a reasonable inference or an unanswered detail.
Sometimes the honest answer is that God hasn't told us everything we'd like to know. Admitting that limitation is honest. It shouldn't become a reason to declare every question unknowable. The gospel makes real claims about Christ and calls for real responses. Our task is to seek the clarity God supplies, acknowledge the boundaries of our knowledge, and avoid using uncertainty at the edges as an excuse for disregarding what is clear.
Peter knew more than he practiced
Peter's problem that night wasn't that he had never learned who Jesus was. He had watched and heard the Lord over years of discipleship. Yet during the arrest and trial, John 18 records him denying that he was Jesus' disciple. The problem wasn't simply a lack of information. Fear and pressure interfered with living the conviction he already possessed.
I can know the right answer and still choose the wrong thing when I'm afraid of what people will think. We may know that honesty is right while concealing a fact to protect ourselves. We may believe that Christ deserves allegiance while remaining silent because other people disapprove. The answer isn't to disparage knowledge; it is to prepare to act on it. Identify the pressure you expect and the faithful response it requires before the moment becomes emotionally overwhelming.
Failure need not become abandonment
I'm thankful Peter's failure wasn't the end of his story. The resurrection and the Lord's dealings with him supplied further understanding and a renewed responsibility. He didn't become incapable of inconsistency, however. Galatians 2:11–14 describes Paul confronting him when fear of a particular group led to conduct out of step with the truth of the gospel.
Peter's need for correction reminds me that none of us outgrows the need to listen and repent. Greater knowledge and genuine faith don't remove the need for vigilance, humility, or repentance. When your conduct contradicts your conviction, acknowledge it and receive correction. Don't change the truth merely to make the failure feel less serious, and don't conclude that correction means there is no hope. Return to the Lord's instruction and make the next decision consistent with it.
Ask a question that leads somewhere
What's one question you've been avoiding because you suspect the answer will ask something of you? Put the question into words, gather the relevant passages, and consider the evidence carefully. Then describe what the answer requires in practice. A conclusion about generosity should affect a budget; a conclusion about truthful speech should affect a difficult conversation; a conclusion about Christ should affect the whole direction of life.
We can be confident in God's word and still humble about our own understanding of it. It is a teachable confidence anchored in truth and expressed through obedience. Asking, studying, and doing each have a necessary place. Let the question open a responsible inquiry, let Scripture govern the answer, and let that answer reach the decision you are tempted to avoid. Truth becomes a blessing when we are willing to receive it and walk accordingly.
Ask someone who loves the Lord to look at your reasoning with you. Explain the passage you are using and listen to a correction without demanding immediate agreement. A study partner can't replace your responsibility to think, but another careful reader may notice an assumption you missed. Such conversations can strengthen unity because the shared aim is understanding and obeying the word, rather than defending the reputation of either participant.
Take the idea with you.
- 01Which belief would you find hardest to examine honestly?
- 02What passage or evidence would help you investigate it carefully?
- 03Where does social pressure make it difficult to live what you already know?
Prefer listening?
The original episode player is available near the top of this article, so you can listen without leaving the page.


