Is It Me? Examine Yourself Before Blaming Others
Before assigning all the blame, ask what part belongs to you. Honest self-examination can lead to a correction you can make without controlling someone else's response.
#57 — Is It Me?
Aug 5, 2019
Play the original Excel Still More episode here without leaving the article.
The question we least want to ask
When something goes wrong, we can quickly explain everybody else's contribution. Sometimes one question arrives much later: what did I bring to this? Sometimes those explanations are entirely legitimate. Yet one question often arrives after we have exhausted every other possibility: could I be contributing to this problem?
That question can threaten the story we've told about ourselves. It may reveal an interruption, unfair assumption, or harsh response we'd rather overlook. We may recognize that we have expected standards from others that we rarely meet ourselves.
Asking 'Is it me?' doesn't require accepting blame for another person's wrongdoing. It asks us to identify our own responsibility accurately. It means taking responsibility for the portion of a situation that truly belongs to us, while leaving other people accountable for their own actions. That distinction gives the question both its honesty and its usefulness.
What a doctor's investigation can teach
In nineteenth-century Vienna, Ignaz Semmelweis investigated differences in deaths among maternity patients. His work connected contamination carried by medical staff with the need for disinfection. His conclusions faced resistance at a time when medical understanding of infection remained limited.
The story asks us whether familiar practices are receiving honest examination. Our disagreements aren't equivalent to those medical tragedies, but defensiveness can still keep us from noticing a needed change. Rather, it challenges our willingness to investigate something familiar. An established habit can feel normal precisely because we have repeated it so long, even when there is strong reason to question it.
Keep the history more careful than a tale about one flawless hero and universally foolish opponents. Its useful challenge is whether reputation has become more important than learning the truth. The desire to defend our reputation must not become stronger than our desire to understand the truth.
A log before a speck
Jesus gives a striking picture in Matthew 7:1–5. A log in our own eye makes us poorly equipped to attend eagerly to a brother's speck. The exaggerated contrast exposes the foolishness of attending eagerly to another's small fault while ignoring a far more serious problem in oneself.
The passage doesn't forbid helping the brother. It puts the removal of our own obstruction first, so the help can be given with clear sight.
We can excuse in ourselves the tone or neglect we quickly condemn in another. Honest examination needs to consider whether we're applying the same standard fairly. Someone who frequently arrives late becomes frustrated with another's tardiness. We may magnify another person's weaknesses because we see them from the outside while explaining away our own because we know the circumstances. Jesus calls us to begin with ourselves rather than congratulate ourselves for noticing what is wrong with everyone else.
Stop demanding control of another person
We may spend years rehearsing how another person ought to respond. The rehearsal can't give us the power to make that person's decisions. Sometimes that desire is understandable.
Romans 12:18 tells us to seek peace as far as it depends on us. That qualification protects both responsibility and an honest limit. Peace doesn't always depend upon one person. Another may refuse to act rightly, and appropriate boundaries or protective measures may be necessary. Still, our own tone, honesty, and willingness to respond wisely remain within our responsibility.
Name what faithfulness asks of you in the actual situation. A clearer request, sincere apology, or refusal to escalate may be the part available now. Those choices don't guarantee reconciliation, but they prevent your own growth from being held hostage to another person's response.
Listen longer than feels comfortable
James 1:19 gives hearing a place before hasty speech and anger. We often begin defending ourselves before we've understood what's being said. We hear an accusation, become angry, and speak quickly. By the time the other person has finished, we have already delivered our defense and decided that the entire problem belongs to them.
Listening takes effort rather than passivity. Ask what the person means, then check whether your understanding represents the concern fairly. It can include repeating the concern in your own words and asking whether you have understood correctly. In many disagreements, this simple practice reveals that two people have been arguing about different things or reacting to a misunderstanding rather than an actual disagreement.
A useful discovery about your conduct deserves an actual response. The next conversation can become practice instead of another occasion to repeat the same pattern. Once we recognize a familiar habit of interrupting, exaggerating, or dismissing people, we must choose a different response. The next difficult conversation provides an opportunity to turn what we know into something we do.
Correction needs humility and discernment
Another person may see what you've stopped noticing. Receiving that feedback can be uncomfortable without making it unhelpful. Asking a person for honest feedback can feel risky because the answer may challenge a story we have repeated about ourselves for years.
Psalm 139:23–24 expresses a desire to be searched and directed rightly. It's a prayer for honest examination, rather than endless self-accusation. Godly humility asks whether something truly needs to change, while trusting Scripture to establish the standard.
Not every criticism is true. Compare the claim with Scripture and the facts instead of treating humility as an obligation to agree with every accusation. Consider criticism carefully, compare it with Scripture and facts, and seek sound counsel where needed. We can be open to correction without becoming incapable of judgment. The aim is truth, not either defensiveness or surrender.
Make the change that belongs to you
Choose one recurring difficulty and describe it fairly. Don't leave out the other person's wrong, but don't make it conceal your own contribution either. Maybe a workplace responsibility always generates frustration. Perhaps you have criticized a fellow Christian for years without ever considering how your responses affect the situation. Don't begin by pretending the other person has done nothing wrong. Begin by acknowledging the whole problem as fairly as you can.
Then identify a change you can actually make. Keep it specific enough that another emotional promise isn't mistaken for repair. You might clarify a request before reacting to it. You might stop using sarcasm during a serious conversation. You may need to establish a necessary boundary without hostility or follow through on a commitment you have neglected.
A small action can matter without settling every disagreement. Take it because it's faithful, rather than because it guarantees another person's cooperation. You do need to stop waiting for an ideal response from someone else before practicing what you know is right. Even when the outcome is uncertain, you can become more honest, patient, and responsible.
The courage to own what is yours
Blaming everyone else can feel comfortable because it excuses further thought. It also leaves the part we could correct untouched.
Galatians 6:1 keeps gentle restoration beside watching ourselves. Helping others never makes our own vulnerability disappear. We may need to help another person, but we never outgrow the need for humility about our own vulnerability and conduct.
Ask the question with fairness rather than fear. An honest answer can help you act more wisely, whether you need a personal correction or a responsible response to someone else's wrong. Perhaps you will discover an overlooked habit you can begin correcting today. Either way, honesty offers a better beginning than years of blame. Remove the log where you find it, see more clearly, and let the next step be one of faithful responsibility.
Take the idea with you.
- 01What recurring problem do I explain almost entirely by another person's behavior?
- 02What can I change faithfully even if the other person does not cooperate?
- 03Whose constructive feedback would help me see what I am overlooking?
Prefer listening?
The original episode player is available near the top of this article, so you can listen without leaving the page.
