Alcohol and the Christian: Why Our Family Chooses Abstinence
Our family chooses abstinence because of sobriety, caution, influence, and love. Consider the reasoning with an open Bible and care for the people around you.
#417 — Alcohol and the Christian - The Emerson Family's Conviction
Mar 9, 2026
Play the original Excel Still More episode here without leaving the article.
A conviction worth explaining carefully
Christians do not all answer every question about alcohol in the same way. Some regard any use as wrong. Some personally abstain while being careful about judging another person. Others believe limited use may be permissible while recognizing that drunkenness is condemned. Naming the differences does not settle the study. It can help us speak honestly about where we are beginning. I want to explain our family's practice with clear reasons from Scripture and a spirit that leaves room for thoughtful questions.
Our family's choice is abstinence. Sharing that conviction is an invitation to consider our reasoning, not a substitute for your own careful study of Scripture. It is an explanation of how several biblical principles come together in our decisions. We want to honor God, preserve sober judgment, protect our influence, and avoid putting another person at risk. Those concerns deserve serious consideration wherever someone currently stands in the discussion.
Begin with what Scripture makes clear
Begin with what is clear. Galatians 5:19–21 includes drunkenness among the works of the flesh, and Ephesians 5:18 directly warns against being drunk with wine. Proverbs 20:1 cautions about being led astray, while Proverbs 23:29–35 describes the trouble and repeated desire associated with uncontrolled drinking. Those warnings deserve real weight. Whatever further questions we study, we should not make the plainly stated danger seem like a minor issue beside a debate about precisely where the line begins.
Let that clear instruction shape the question you bring. Ask what supports faithfulness before asking how near you can move to something Scripture warns against. A person who acknowledges the danger has reason to think carefully before entering the path that leads toward it. Our family’s decision is to avoid that path. Other questions still deserve study, but they should never make the explicit warning against drunkenness seem secondary or reduce it to a technical detail.
Sober-mindedness is a positive calling
First Peter repeatedly calls us to be sober-minded and watchful. In 1:13, the mind is prepared for action and hope is fixed on Christ's grace. In 4:7, clear-mindedness serves prayer. In 5:8, vigilance belongs in resisting the devil. Those calls reach more than a discussion about a drink. They describe the kind of alert, self-controlled people we want to become. Our practical decisions should support that positive direction rather than continually ask what we can do without losing it.
That positive calling is important in our family's decision. We want choices that support clear judgment, self-control, and readiness to respond faithfully to God and people. We do not see alcohol as helping us grow in those qualities. The reasoning is broader than asking whether a particular amount crosses a precisely measured threshold. It asks what direction best supports the kind of person Scripture calls us to become. Abstinence is a clear and workable way for our household to express that commitment without needing to negotiate the amount on each occasion.
Take the warnings and lived consequences seriously
Proverbs 23 portrays someone who experiences harm and returns to the same desire. We should let that warning examine us with humility. An appetite can become difficult to govern, and acknowledging that possibility before beginning a pattern is sensible. Our family sees no necessary good in alcohol that requires us to enter that risk. We can receive friendship, rest, hospitality, and celebration in other ways. Our decision grows from caution and purpose, with no need to look down on someone already struggling.
That concern helps explain our conviction. We would rather decline something we do not need than begin a pattern we recognize could become destructive. That is a family judgment about wisdom and practice, stated openly. It should lead us toward compassion for people who struggle, rather than pride toward them. If someone is dealing with dependence, they deserve truthful concern and appropriate help. A Christian response seeks their good instead of using their difficulty merely as an argument.
Culture is not a substitute for conviction
First Peter 4:3–4 describes people being surprised when Christians stop participating in former conduct. Familiar social expectations do not decide what pleases God. A group may find a choice normal and still be wrong to require it of you. We want our children to know they can decline an invitation without being ashamed of a thoughtfully held conviction. It helps to know the reason before the pressure comes, so the response can be calm instead of hurried or defensive.
You can decline without hostility or a display of superiority. A simple explanation can keep both kindness and conviction visible in the same conversation. Hospitality, friendship, and celebration can be genuine without participation in everything a group expects. Our family wants children to know that they may choose a different course without needing to apologize for honoring their convictions. That lesson applies far beyond this topic: social acceptance is a poor foundation for any decision that must finally be answered before God.
Love makes another person’s welfare relevant
Romans 14:13–23 asks us to care about another believer's conscience and spiritual welfare. A stumbling block is more serious than someone merely disliking a preference. We should study the passage carefully and still hear its call to love. Could my example lead someone toward conduct they believe is wrong? Could my choice invite a vulnerable person into a struggle? I need to consider more than whether I feel free. Christian freedom is meant to be governed by concern for others.
The question reaches beyond my personal comfort with a choice. I also need to consider whether someone might follow my example into something they cannot responsibly manage. Could someone follow me while believing the action is wrong? Am I prepared to give up a preference for another person’s good? These questions carry particular weight in our family’s decision. We would rather decline something unnecessary than encourage another believer into a struggle. Love is willing to limit itself, and that willingness can become a strong Christian influence.
Discuss the conviction before the pressure arrives
Talk about a family conviction before an invitation puts someone on the spot. Explain the practice and the biblical concerns behind it. Help young people prepare a respectful way to answer a question or decline. They need more than a prohibition they feel unable to explain. They also need to know they can bring uncertainty home without being treated as a disappointment. Good teaching gives reasons, invites honest discussion, and helps a child learn how to make a responsible decision.
Keep space for questions about Scripture and real situations with friends. When someone admits pressure or uncertainty, listen before assuming the admission means the teaching has failed. A thoughtful family conviction becomes stronger when its members understand the reasoning and know they can seek help. The same applies between adults who differ. Share your practice without accusing the other person of motives you cannot know, and listen without assuming that their question is an attack. Clarity and humility can make a serious discussion more useful than defensiveness on either side.
Study with conviction and treat people with humility
Questions about ancient wine, word meanings, and the boundaries Scripture gives deserve careful study. We should not settle them with a convenient slogan or assume everyone who differs is insincere. We also should not use the presence of disagreement as an excuse never to decide how we will live. Form a conviction from the whole counsel you can responsibly understand, keep learning, and practice it with humility. A serious discussion can remain useful when both people care about truth and the good of those around them.
Our household continues to choose abstinence because of sobriety, caution, influence, and love. Explaining that choice need not become a personal accusation against someone willing to discuss it. Keep the Bible open, be honest about motives, and let the clearest teachings govern the rest of the discussion. Whatever conclusion you reach, do not treat drunkenness lightly or disregard the welfare of people around you. A faithful conviction should produce disciplined conduct and a gracious willingness to help, rather than merely another point to win.
Take the idea with you.
- 01Have I studied this question honestly, or mainly defended a position I already preferred?
- 02How do my choices support sober-mindedness and a clear Christian influence?
- 03Who could be affected by the example I set, especially someone vulnerable to temptation?
Prefer listening?
The original episode player is available near the top of this article, so you can listen without leaving the page.
